• x86_64@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I’ve never been bothered by the time changing twice a year, why do people want to abolish it so much?

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        It leads to statistically significant increases in human death, injury, and financial loss due to stress caused by disruptions to circadian rhythm. The question you should be asking is “why do we still do it despite this, when there is literally no benefit?”

        • kuerbiskernoel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          The benefit is more sun. Permanent normal time would give us sunrise at 5 am in summer while permanent offset time would give us sunrise at 9 am in winter. By changing the time twice a year we get 6 am and 8 am.

          • angrystego@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            What’s so special about sunrise though? The sunset influences our lives greatly as well. I understand 8am is better than 9am for outdoor workers, because they can start working at the same time as other people.

            • kuerbiskernoel@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              Getting up when the sun rises feels much better than getting up in darkness

              I don’t care as much about sunset, I’m still awake after sunset anyway

              • angrystego@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 days ago

                That probably depends on where you live and what’s your job. For many people it’s impossible to get up after the sun rises anyway, if they want to be at work on time. I can imagine it could be locally advantageous though.

                • kuerbiskernoel@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  I also much prefer the sun rising 1h after I got up than 2h after I got up. Or just seeing the first signs of dawn as Im driving to work

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        I don’t know if many people share my opinion, but I literally don’t care one bit. Let’s all do UTC across the world, the US needs to be taken down a peg anyway.

        • Jaberw0cky@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Surely UTC is just a newer name for GMT and 0 is Greenwich in England? Since I’m pretty sure the UK came up with the global time zone system in the first place.

          • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            There is a slight difference, UTC has leap seconds while GMT stretches seconds to compensate for the uneven spin of the Earth.