• mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I like how there’s so many fees on this console that we haven’t even gotten to the $50 skype webcam accessory which they spent a solid third of their direct showing off.

    I miss the DS era :/

    EDIT:

    I also want to point out this: https://www.nintendolife.com/news/2022/05/reggie-had-to-fight-for-wii-sports-as-a-pack-in-and-miyamoto-wasnt-happy

    Fils-Aimé pushed for the bundle, and initially company President Satoru Iwata turned the proposal down: “Nintendo does not give away precious content for free.”

    “Neither of you understands the challenges of creating software that people love to play. This is something we constantly push ourselves to do. We do not give away our software,” Mr. Miyamoto stated.

    It’s ironic that with the success of Wii sports, Nintendo completely ignored the lesson.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Who’s going to buy that camera though? It’s only so you can talk to 3 other people, and none of the games that make use of it look any good.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      All the important people at nintendo have been separated from reality by their own fame and success for so long that they’ve lost their common sense and rationality.

      But despite it all, their absolute contempt for their costumers and supporters continues to get rewarded by masses of fanboys/fangirls who keep unloading dumptrucks of money on Nintendos doorstop out of some obsessive nostalgia, and thus keeps nintendo from ever actually learning an actual fucking lesson.

  • midori matcha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    4 days ago

    $10 is the “go fuck yourself” price for things that would otherwise be free.

    You’ve already spent $450 on the console, $90 on a game, and $50 for the full online subscription. What’s $10 more dollars for the welcome demo? Go fuck yourself, pay the plumber man.

    • Hoimo@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, I expected them to ask the full $60 for it, which would be completely unreasonable, but at least I understand why they wouldn’t give it away then. But 10? They could easily eat that, they just don’t want to.

      Either way, I can’t imagine anyone paying for a “game” that’s nothing more than an instruction booklet. If it were free, maybe someone would open it while Mario Kart is downloading.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      “This is the stuffed crust… filled with cheese and pepperoni. It’s like calzone in a bread stick form factor!”

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 days ago

    I was on the fence about Switch 2, leaning toward not getting one. This just solidified that position. No way I’m paying for something that charges for the instruction manual.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      May I introduce you to their last launch day tech demo… 1-2 Switch?

      Yeah. You forgot about $60 launch day tech demo 1-2 Switch, didn’t you?

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        The only reason they sold any was because the console released with like one game, which seems to be the same strategy this time around too.

          • jacksilver@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            Exactly, the only real first party game was BOTW (and that also released on the Wii u).

            There were some smaller games, like 12 switch/snipperclips/fast rmx, but the switch on release (and most of its life) was struggling for games.

            • madjo@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              It has a shitload of indie games and on top of that a lot of shovel ware though.

    • weststadtgesicht@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      How is this stupid? Call it greedy or anti-consumer, but in the end it will increase Nintendo’s profits so it’s far from stupid from the company’s perspective. People buy consoles no matter how bad they are treated. Maybe you should call consumers stupid instead?

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        Nintendo can and has pushed the greed too far for even Nintendo fans before. Wii U and 3DS at launch being fairly recent examples.

      • Jakob Fel@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        The problem is that a company can only push their greed so far before they start losing people. Up until now, most of the Nintendo hate came from their anti-emulation crusade. Now, it seems like everyone and their brother is talking about just how absurd the entirety of this launch is.

        • omarfw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          On places like reddit, Lenny, etc where there is a vocal minority complaining about this. The vast majority of consumers don’t come on here nor do they keep themselves informed. They’ll grumble at the price a bit, then buy it anyway.

          • Jakob Fel@retrolemmy.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’m not talking about Lemmy. I’m talking about literally every community I’ve looked. Aside from fanboys being fanboys, the reaction has been nothing but outrage.

  • gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    5 days ago

    So it’s a $10 tutorial? Don’t care how expansive and cool it is, that’s just fucked. The project scope should’ve been adjusted to make sure it would be free.

    • tiramichu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Exactly! What sort of logic are they even trying to apply there? Basically saying “We put a lot of time into our tech demo, and it came out better than expected, so we’re going to charge for it!”

      That’s just crazy.

      The whole principle is that the intro experience is supposed to be free. It exists to get people pumped about the cool new thing they just bought and excited to play with it.

      I guess Nintendo decided that - since you already bought the console - they don’t especially care if you are pumped or not. They already got your money.

  • icecreamtaco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Makes sense, but if it’s only $10 it should just be free. $10 isn’t worth the bad PR and they should want this tour thing in as many hands as possible.

  • TwinTitans@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    There isn’t one reason they could give that would ever justify this for the consumer. Absolutely unacceptable and anti consumer.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Nintendo is being exclusively run by suits now. The era of a game company built by gamers is over.

      • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 days ago

        You’re thinking iwata, but that was a brief blip on Nintendo history. The OG CEO was a straight up suit. The man had no interest in videogames, only business. Which is why they practically had a monopoly over their hardware in the 80s and 90s.

        • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          The OG CEO is from the 1800s so yeah. And yes I’m thinking of Iwata. And look at what was produced during his tenure. That’s the Nintendo everyone is nostalgic about nowadays. 1989 Nintendo was a corporation throwing spaghetti at the wall, 2000’s Nintendo was streamlining the end gamer experience, 2020’s Nintendo is looking for an easy paycheck.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    "Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour is described as a “virtual exhibition” of the new hardware. Per Nintendo: “through tech demos, minigames and other interactions, players will get to know the new system inside and out in ways they may never have known about otherwise.”

    So its basically just something that goes on about how great and wonderful switch is? And they want you to pay for it? This is so stupid I’m not sure if its even anti consumer anymore but somehow managed to go beyond to new levels of awfulness.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s kind of like the Valve demo that’s free on the Steam Deck to go through all the features on the machine, except not as interesting.

  • Vopyr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Damn, Nintendo is such a crap company… What the heck is wrong with them?

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      They’re Sony ca. 2006, fresh off the success of the PS2.

      Or Microsoft ca. 2013, fresh off the success of the Xbox 360.

      • thequickben@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        At least Sony had some justification. A new and expensive cell architecture. It was ground breaking for its time but cost too much.

        Nintendo is giving us something the steam deck and other pc handhelds can do, and trying to charge $80 for games that will almost never go on sale. I can buy old steam titles for less than $10, show me an old Nintendo title that can ever sell for that amount. It’s just not a good enough proposition just to have access to a handful of $80 Nintendo titles.

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, I could stomach the price of the console, but no way am I ever going to pay those outrageous prices that never go down for first party games, and without those there’s no point in getting a Switch 2 over a Steam Deck. I’ll have a lot of Nintendo games to catch up on once decent Switch 2 emulators are a thing.