• 0 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: September 14th, 2024

help-circle
  • Your argument is a perfect example of how we sanitize our migration policies with euphemisms. “Border control” sounds neutral and reasonable, but what we’re really talking about is active policies that regularly result in preventable deaths.

    Frontex doesn’t just “control borders” - they push migrants back to Libya where they face documented torture and sexual violence. They don’t accidentally fail to rescue people - they actively avoid responding to distress calls. These aren’t unintended consequences; they’re the designed outcome of policies meant to create a “deterrent effect.”

    Whether it’s technically “racism” by your narrow definition is beside the point. The reality is we apply completely different standards to different groups of migrants. When Ukrainians needed refuge, we quickly created special protection status. When Syrian doctors needed refuge, we let their families drown in the Mediterranean. The difference isn’t “HOW they come” - it’s who they are and where they’re from.

    Your claim that “we don’t care about the color of their skin” is contradicted by statements from European politicians who explicitly advocated for Ukrainian refugees because they were “European” with “blue eyes and blonde hair” (as multiple news anchors and politicians stated in 2022).

    And yes, a “few politicians” absolutely represent broader European attitudes when they’re leading political parties and setting policy. Friedrich Merz isn’t some random person - he’s likely to be Germany’s next Chancellor. When these politicians face no meaningful backlash for their statements, it reveals societal acceptance.

    The problem isn’t that we want functioning migration systems. It’s that we’ve created a two-tier system where people from certain regions are forced into deadly routes and then blamed for taking them, while we pretend this isn’t connected to who they are.



  • Our “capacity to help” is inconsistent and conditional. Yes, there was initial support for Ukrainian refugees, but as I mentioned in another post politicians like Friedrich Merz (likely next German Chancellor) soon accused them of “social welfare tourism.” Same happened e.g. in Poland. The welcome narrative quickly gave way to scapegoating.

    This pattern happens repeatedly. We initially welcome groups based on perceived usefulness or cultural similarity, then turn on them when convenient. Polish workers in the UK went from being praised as hardworking to being blamed for “stealing jobs” and straining services.

    You’re assuming Americans would be “more easily accepted” because they’re “wealthy and educated,” but this ignores how xenophobia operates. Brexit campaigners didn’t distinguish between Polish doctors and laborers - they lumped all migrants together.

    Even well-off migrants become targets during economic downturns. Look at how Romanian doctors and nurses in the UK were treated during Brexit despite filling critical NHS shortages. Or how German refugees after WWII faced hostility from other Germans.

    Our immigration policies aren’t based on humanitarian concerns but on economic utility and cultural anxieties. When politicians need scapegoats, they’ll target any migrant group regardless of their contributions.

    The Americans who’d face the most persecution under Trump are often the same ones who’d face discrimination here - LGBTQ+ people, religious minorities, and people of color. The idea that we’d somehow treat them better than other migrants ignores Europe’s deep-seated xenophobia.


  • With Ukrainians, we initially saw a wave of genuine support that I was happy about. But within months, politicians started using them as scapegoats. Friedrich Merz, likely the next German Chancellor, accused Ukrainians of “social welfare tourism” - as if they were fleeing bombs for German benefits. Similar rhetoric emerged in Poland and Hungary, where the initial “these are Europeans like us” sentiment gave way to the same xenophobic patterns.

    The point is - even that initial acceptance runs out eventually. No matter who you are, we will eventually turn against you given enough time. Americans coming now might be welcomed as “expats” with valuable skills, but as soon as there’s another economic downturn or political shift, they’ll be “immigrants taking our jobs” or “ruining our housing market.”


  • You’re cherry-picking examples and artificially narrowing this to “Black Americans vs. African migrants” when my original point was about Europe’s broader treatment of migrants and refugees from many backgrounds.

    Why are we suddenly only discussing Black people? My original comments covered migrants from various regions, including Middle Eastern refugees, Ukrainians, and Southern Europeans. This selective focus is a distraction from the systemic issues I highlighted.

    Even if we accept your unsupported claim about differential treatment (which needs actual evidence), it doesn’t disprove discrimination - it just shows how xenophobia intersects with class, perceived cultural compatibility, and legal status.

    The documented policy failures at Europe’s borders affect migrants from Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, various African nations, and elsewhere. Focusing on how “Black Americans face no issues” (which is itself questionable) ignores the thousands who drown in the Mediterranean or face abuse in detention centers.

    Let’s return to the actual evidence: Europe has policies that result in documented human rights abuses at borders. We criminalize rescue operations. We fund dictatorships to stop migrants before they reach us. We’ve created a system where people die rather than receive help.

    These aren’t opinions - they’re documented facts. Whether you call it racism, xenophobia or “migration management,” we’ve normalized treating certain groups of human beings as disposable.


  • I would say your entire argument is based on an approach where you create a definition of racism that’s extremely narrow and then claim it doesn’t exist in Europe because it doesn’t meet your specific criteria.

    Frontex literally pushes people back at sea where they drown, sends people to places where they’re tortured and raped, and we collectively allow this to happen. That’s institutionalized racism whether you like it or not.

    Your claim that “if white people came by sea they’d face the same fate” is a hypothetical that can’t be verified - it’s a classic counterfactual fallacy. The reality is that we don’t see masses of white people drowning in the Mediterranean while the EU turns a blind eye.

    You’re also trying to define racism only as “racial laws” which is an incredibly narrow definition that no sociologist would accept. Structural racism manifests in policies, practices, and institutions - it doesn’t require explicit “whites only” signs to exist.

    Regarding Ukrainian refugees versus other refugee groups: initially there was indeed more acceptance based on perceived cultural similarity and yes, race. But as I already mentioned, even Ukrainian refugees are now being scapegoated by politicians in Poland, Hungary and other countries. The pattern is clear - initial acceptance followed by growing hostility.

    The European Parliament groupings you mention are irrelevant to my argument. I was clearly talking about national politics where far-right parties have either gained power or significant influence in Hungary, Italy, Austria, Sweden, Netherlands, France and Germany among others.

    Your attempt to frame this as “open borders extremism” versus “moderate border control” is a classic false dichotomy. There’s a massive difference between reasonable border management and letting people drown at sea, which is what Frontex does.

    I stand by what I said - Europe has deeply ingrained xenophobia, and Americans coming here will discover that too once the novelty wears off. They’ll be blamed for housing problems, job market issues, and changing the culture - just like every other immigrant group before them.







  • I feel like we have absolutely zero vision for the future. Like, there’s trade wars, actual wars going on. Russia and Israel are committing genocide and are ignoring the ICC. Most of the EU is cool with that, either because they support Israel or worse they support Israel & Russia both. So we basically abandoned international law and with that humanity itself, and for what? Short term political gains.

    Instead of capitalizing on the influx of skilled & motivated people from all over the world we chose to give in to hate and violence a long time ago. With the help of frontex we let the most miserable drown in the Mediterranean Sea, die somewhere in the Sahara or get raped and enslaved somewhere in a Tunisian prison, an Italian farm, or the Belarus border just to mention a few examples. We abandoned humanity there as well and again for what?

    On top of that, my country‘s infrastructure is falling apart, people can’t afford housing anymore, healthcare gets more expensive and worse at the same time, and we’re basically a tech colony with all the American and Chinese tech dominating our lives. These countries also don’t give a fuck about humanity, but they produce innovation. What kind of innovation are we producing? We have Spotify, great.

    I see no vision either about what our values are (there are no credible ones), nor about what our business model during this new industrial revolution should be and how people should be able to make a living in the future. It’s so fucking frustrating to watch.

    Having humanity and good living conditions could have been a vision in this cruel world, but we aren’t good enough to live it. We failed.




  • Frontex literally sends them back to get raped & tortured and literally is the reason thousands per year drown in the Mediterranean Sea. We hate migrants, that is a European core value.

    Not convinced? After 2nd world war, Germans even hated German refugees. Since then, migrants in Western/Northern Europe have been 2nd class citizens. Brexit went through partly as a campaign against migrants from Poland & Romania.

    Still not convinced? It’s not about cultural compatibility or religion or skin color or anything. Ukrainian refugees have been met with empathy because of their skin color and religion at first (but we‘re _ definitely_ not racist and sorry for saying the quiet part out loud). However, in countries like Poland, Hungary and Germany who took on most of the refugees politicians already started using Ukrainians as scapegoats and the hate mongering hit them too.

    Think it will be different with Americans? They’re gonna be the ones who took our jobs, always act entitled, destroy our work culture by always being available and ruining the housing market (as if that weren’t already fucked up). To an extent, this is how we see Americans already.

    We are a racist, backwards continent. I wish it were different, but this is who we are.