This is not a legal contract, it’s a general guideline for users about what is or isn’t acceptable. The intent and spirit of the terms are clear, the only question is whether Google will enforce them not. If the enforcement is crappy, like what Facebook is famous for, it doesn’t matter a damn what exact terminology they use in the guidelines.
The ban already happened. There was nothing massively unpopular about it. And whoever lets the exemption lapse doesn’t have to take the heat for it, since they can just blame it on Biden.
How would you prevent that? The US can just ban Tiktok anytime and gain that prop stranglehold.
It’s only US Tiktok that’s under discussion for sale. Nobody’s talking about buying Tiktok globally.
No, but I think most of the people on Lemmy should know better than that.
Looks at Hexbear, .ml, and to some extent Blahaj
Oh, who am I kidding.
https://sh.itjust.works/post/35485725
This is you right now. Most of us have no idea what Misskey is.
While I hate Google, this seems like one of those much ados over nothing. They specifically mention ‘sex, gender, or sexual orientation’, which to most reasonable people would cover gender identity.
I think this post would have been a lot more enlightening had it gone into what exactly *key instances are.
The global birth rate is already at or even below the replacement rate. The only reason we’re not seeing population shrinkage right now is due to inertia. It takes decades for changes in the birth rate to reflect in the actual population figures, but it will happen. It won’t however happen in time to prevent environmental catastrophe, which is what most people think of when they cheer dropping birth rates. It will just be the social catastrophe of the next century.
Unrelated cheap advertising: Join us at !Norway@sopuli.xyz!
won’t be as good as Apple.
Depends on your criteria. For me it’s hard to get worse than them.
Norway is a bit too small to be a fallback. The EU is pretty much the last remaining major bastion of sanity.
peaced out before being arrested
Probably not, given the house was occupied at the time of the raid.
Wonder how Finns feel about this?
It doesn’t. It’s not like this page gets used internally. They have their own internal guidelines for that.