Sl00k@programming.dev to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoGreat ATProto blog post on the reasoning behind their design architectureatproto.comexternal-linkmessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up173arrow-down117
arrow-up156arrow-down1external-linkGreat ATProto blog post on the reasoning behind their design architectureatproto.comSl00k@programming.dev to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-squareCondiment2085@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down3·2 days agoWait how is it not the fediverse?
minus-squareboramalper@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·2 days agoBy “Fediverse” people usually refer to “ActivityPub”-based social networks such as Mastodon and Lemmy. People also rightfully argue that Bluesky, despite the best of intentions, is not decentralised. See How decentralized is Bluesky really? (long read).
minus-squareZaktor@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·2 days agoThe Fediverse is a specific thing. And even if it were just referring to any federated social network, it’s very questionable whether Bluesky really can have independent instances.
minus-squareAirportline@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·edit-21 day agoThe ATProto equivalent of the word “Fediverse” is “Atmosphere.”
Wait how is it not the fediverse?
By “Fediverse” people usually refer to “ActivityPub”-based social networks such as Mastodon and Lemmy.
People also rightfully argue that Bluesky, despite the best of intentions, is not decentralised. See How decentralized is Bluesky really? (long read).
The Fediverse is a specific thing. And even if it were just referring to any federated social network, it’s very questionable whether Bluesky really can have independent instances.
The ATProto equivalent of the word “Fediverse” is “Atmosphere.”