https://archive.is/wLkT3

“We want to reverse the mistake of the ‘traffic light’ and ban cannabis again,” Bavarian Health Minister Joachim Herrmann told the newspaper. The southern region’s Health Minister Judith Gerlach also criticized the legalization of cannabis for recreational purposes, saying the measure should be “withdrawn quickly and completely,”

  • jagermo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    Keep it legal, sell it and tax it. Boom, new revenue stream. Tag the tax income to go 100 percent into healthcare and elderly care. Solve your issues.

  • Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I am sure Minister Herrmann is only defending a health oriented position, which is why he has also proposed to ban alcohol and tobacco products. Especially Bavaria is known for the largest junkie-festival in the world. It is known as “Oktoberfest”.

    Or didn’t he? … oh no. Wait…

    Could it be that this advance stems from counterfactual opinions again?

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Absolutely myopic idiots. They need all the money they can get and their great idea is to focus on one of the things that could make them loads.

  • Hubi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    There’s pretty much zero chance that cannabis will become illegal again in Germany under a CDU/SPD coalition. This is just hot air from Bavaria.

    • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Why do you think that? It’s a great topic for a culture war. If they need to divert attention from something more important, they’ll bring that up and that may force them to actually do it. It’s not like any of those weed-growers would ever vote for them either.

      • Hubi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        The CDU has shown that they are not necessarily firm on many of their previous positions from the election campaign, such as the Building Energy Act or the debt brake. I can’t imagine them pushing hard on such a minor talking point while they are in a coalition with one of the largest parties in support of the legalization. It’s just not worth it.

        • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          SPD is wavering on the topic anyway and current health minister Lauterbach was never a big supporter either, he did it largely because he wanted to keep the promise from the coalition treaty. From what I can tell, the supporters came mostly from the Greens, the socialdemocratic youth org, and the green youth org.

          • Hubi@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            SPD is wavering on the topic anyway

            I’m not seeing that tbh. Pretty much every statement that the party has put out in regards to the CanG and the coalition talks has been in support of it. They moved it to the very end of the talks too. The most that will happen are some minor adjustments that both parties will be fine with. Nobody relevant to these talks is actually in full support of ending the legalization. The statements are just pandering.

            • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Alright, let’s see, I may be wrong and we won’t have to wait too long until the coalition is formally agreed upon. For the moment, I still think the topic is not universally supported within SPD and it’s not a priority to them.

  • petrescatraian@libranet.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Because surely someone asked about this /s

    Didn’t they need some money for the arms industry? How will pumping the money into restricting this help out?