• liop7k@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    What kind of private communication can we talk about if you must have a valid phone number to use Signal?! Lol

      • girlthing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        Pretty sure you still need a phone number for an account, though - the usernames are just for sharing your contact with other people.

        Most peoples’ phone numbers are easily linked to their identity. Which means the government knows who’s using Signal.

        Usernames are definitely an improvement, but this is a fundamental limitation in Signal’s design.

        • Thorned_Rose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          If you want to get really technical, each Signal account actually has a ‘secret’ account number that the phone number is linked to. The phone number requirement is actually a means to reduce spam and scam accounts.

          • girlthing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 days ago

            So they could have replaced it with, like, email verification or something, but they instead stuck to the design that lets governments identify all users?

            <Insert rampant and unfounded speculation about FBI compromise here>