• Zykino@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 days ago

      Source can be destroyed. An alternative screenshoot backup/proof is good measure. Especially in web its better to not depend on an outside server.

      Like if they close (or some billionaire buy them and requires an account for everything), your content becomes worthless.

        • Zykino@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          I don’t say “remove the source”, I say “the source can disappear, the way back machine have already been attacked, just do your own copy of the source and make it available”.

          I know screenshots can be faked, but if your news source does it it is not reliable. Drop it immediately.

          • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            In that case, too, the text can be quoted, then just like magic it’s accessible. A quote that links to the source is a strong combination.

            Everyone benefits: the text is searchable, reflowable, adaptable to multi-modal input & output, easy to quote via copy & paste, etc. It’s simply more useful & screenshots don’t inherently give any of that.

            • Zykino@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              Yes. I talked about screenshots because the first message said:

              I can’t see any screenshots from the article, all require a bluesky account. At least on twitter you could see images without login before the takeover.

              For “text source only” I’m with you quotes are enough.

              And if images are post anywhere, always provide an alt text, plz everyone !

              • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                If the point is to reproduce an image, not text, then yes, definitely provide those images. Agreed: nothing wrong in that.